Industry stats Updated Jun 2026All domains worldwide 392.5M registered names +6.5% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net total 176.1M names in zone Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026WordPress 41.5% of all sites · 59.3% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Shopify 5.2% of all sites · 7.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Wix 4.3% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Joomla 1.2% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Webflow 0.9% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026No CMS detected 30% of all sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTDFortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARCFortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCInc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCDeal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). 2025Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue (Hg-backed) acquired Loopia Group (Nordics) in 2025. 2025Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Perwyn-backed Miss Group acquired Web4U s.r.o. (Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider) in 2025. This is Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership. 2025Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired Webglobe (Slovakia/Czechia/Serbia) in 2025. 2025Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com (formerly World Host Group) acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025, rebranding A2 Hosting under the hosting.com name. 2025Industry stats Updated Jun 2026All domains worldwide 392.5M registered names +6.5% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net total 176.1M names in zone Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026WordPress 41.5% of all sites · 59.3% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Shopify 5.2% of all sites · 7.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Wix 4.3% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Joomla 1.2% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Webflow 0.9% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026No CMS detected 30% of all sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTDFortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARCFortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCInc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCDeal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). 2025Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue (Hg-backed) acquired Loopia Group (Nordics) in 2025. 2025Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Perwyn-backed Miss Group acquired Web4U s.r.o. (Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider) in 2025. This is Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership. 2025Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired Webglobe (Slovakia/Czechia/Serbia) in 2025. 2025Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com (formerly World Host Group) acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025, rebranding A2 Hosting under the hosting.com name. 2025
Security Vulnerabilities

Microsoft uncovers USB-spreading crypto-stealing malware

Crypto Clipper worm spreads via USB drives, harvesting wallet credentials and screenshots via Tor.

Microsoft uncovers USB-spreading crypto-stealing malware
Егор Ахматьяров · Pexels

A newly discovered malware strain is targeting cryptocurrency users by spreading through USB drives and harvesting wallet credentials. Microsoft, which detected the threat, has named it Crypto Clipper due to its method of monitoring device clipboards for patterns matching wallet addresses or seed phrases. Once identified, the malware captures five screenshots over a 10-second interval and transmits both the credentials and images to attackers via the Tor network, obscuring the origin and destination of the data.

The malware’s design avoids conventional installation methods or exposed IP-based command-and-control (C2) infrastructure. Instead, it deploys a portable Tor client and routes traffic through a local SOCKS5 proxy, blending data theft with remote code execution capabilities. This approach allows Crypto Clipper to function as both a financially motivated stealer and a lightweight backdoor, expanding its potential impact beyond simple credential theft.

How the malware operates

Crypto Clipper’s propagation relies on USB drives, a vector that has seen renewed use in recent years due to its effectiveness in bypassing network-based defenses. Once a drive is infected, the malware scans the clipboard of any device it connects to, replacing cryptocurrency wallet addresses with attacker-controlled ones. The use of Tor ensures that the malware’s communications remain anonymous, complicating efforts to trace or block the exfiltration of stolen data.

Microsoft’s analysis highlights the malware’s efficiency in evading detection. By avoiding traditional C2 infrastructure and leveraging Tor’s decentralized network, Crypto Clipper reduces the risk of exposing its operators’ locations or identities. The inclusion of screenshot capture further enhances its ability to gather sensitive information, such as private keys or transaction details, that may not be visible in clipboard data alone.

Implications for security teams

The emergence of Crypto Clipper underscores the persistent threat posed by USB-based malware, particularly in environments where removable media is commonly used. Organizations handling cryptocurrency or managing digital assets should prioritize endpoint protection measures, including disabling autorun features for USB drives and implementing clipboard monitoring tools to detect unusual activity. The malware’s reliance on Tor also suggests that network-level defenses, such as blocking known Tor exit nodes or restricting SOCKS5 proxy usage, could mitigate some risks.

For individual users, the threat serves as a reminder of the importance of verifying wallet addresses before completing transactions. The use of hardware wallets or multi-signature authentication can provide additional layers of security against clipboard-based attacks. Microsoft has not disclosed the scale of infections or the geographic distribution of affected systems, but the malware’s design suggests it could target a broad range of users, from casual cryptocurrency holders to enterprise environments.

What to watch

Security researchers will likely focus on tracking the evolution of Crypto Clipper’s capabilities, particularly its potential to incorporate additional payloads or expand its target scope beyond cryptocurrency. The malware’s use of Tor and SOCKS5 proxies may also prompt renewed scrutiny of anonymous routing protocols in corporate environments. Meanwhile, organizations should assess their exposure to USB-borne threats and consider updating their incident response plans to account for clipboard-based attacks.

For professionals

For professionals: Crypto Clipper’s reliance on USB drives and Tor highlights gaps in traditional endpoint security. Review policies for removable media usage, enforce clipboard monitoring, and evaluate network controls to block unauthorized proxy traffic. Consider deploying behavioral detection tools to identify unusual screenshot activity or data exfiltration patterns.

Discussion · coming soon

Be the first to join the thread when community discussion launches.