Industry stats Updated Jun 2026All domains worldwide 392.5M registered names +6.5% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net total 176.1M names in zone Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026WordPress 41.5% of all sites · 59.3% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Shopify 5.2% of all sites · 7.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Wix 4.3% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Joomla 1.2% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Webflow 0.9% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026No CMS detected 30% of all sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTDFortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARCFortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCInc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCDeal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). 2025Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue (Hg-backed) acquired Loopia Group (Nordics) in 2025. 2025Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Perwyn-backed Miss Group acquired Web4U s.r.o. (Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider) in 2025. This is Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership. 2025Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired Webglobe (Slovakia/Czechia/Serbia) in 2025. 2025Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com (formerly World Host Group) acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025, rebranding A2 Hosting under the hosting.com name. 2025Industry stats Updated Jun 2026All domains worldwide 392.5M registered names +6.5% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net total 176.1M names in zone Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026WordPress 41.5% of all sites · 59.3% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Shopify 5.2% of all sites · 7.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Wix 4.3% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Joomla 1.2% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Webflow 0.9% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026No CMS detected 30% of all sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTDFortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARCFortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCInc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCDeal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). 2025Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue (Hg-backed) acquired Loopia Group (Nordics) in 2025. 2025Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Perwyn-backed Miss Group acquired Web4U s.r.o. (Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider) in 2025. This is Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership. 2025Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired Webglobe (Slovakia/Czechia/Serbia) in 2025. 2025Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com (formerly World Host Group) acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025, rebranding A2 Hosting under the hosting.com name. 2025
Email & Productivity Collaboration Suites

Why Microsoft 365 backup falls short for business data

Organizations relying solely on Microsoft 365’s native tools face gaps in ransomware recovery, compliance, and granular restoration.

Why Microsoft 365 backup falls short for business data
Angel Bena · Pexels

Many businesses assume Microsoft 365 includes comprehensive data protection, but the platform’s native capabilities leave significant gaps in security and recovery. While Microsoft ensures service availability and infrastructure security, customers remain responsible for safeguarding their own data—a distinction often overlooked until an incident occurs. Third-party backup solutions are increasingly positioned as essential for addressing these shortcomings, particularly in scenarios involving ransomware, accidental deletions, or compliance failures.

Key limitations in Microsoft 365’s native protection

Microsoft 365’s design prioritizes productivity over data resilience, creating vulnerabilities in several areas. Native tools like versioning and recycle bins offer only basic recovery options, which are insufficient against sophisticated threats. For example, ransomware attacks targeting cloud environments can encrypt files in OneDrive or SharePoint, with changes syncing instantly across users and devices. While Microsoft’s version history may restore some files, attackers often corrupt multiple versions, leaving organizations uncertain about which recovery points are safe. Third-party solutions address this by providing immutable storage and AI-driven detection to identify clean, pre-attack snapshots.

Compliance presents another challenge. Industries such as healthcare, finance, and legal require long-term data retention with strict audit trails, but Microsoft 365’s retention policies are rigid and lack the granularity needed for regulatory adherence. Native tools also struggle with efficient, granular recovery—restoring a single email or SharePoint document often requires complex workflows or full-site restores, increasing downtime and IT workload. Additionally, Microsoft 365 does not fully mitigate risks from phishing or insider threats, where compromised accounts can delete or manipulate data before detection. Recovery in such cases is typically manual and fragmented, delaying incident response.

For professionals

For professionals: Businesses using Microsoft 365 should evaluate third-party backup solutions that offer immutable storage, AI-based threat detection, and granular recovery. Managed service providers (MSPs) managing multiple tenants should prioritize scalable, per-seat pricing models to avoid cost overruns as data volumes grow.

The case for third-party solutions

Third-party backup platforms aim to fill these gaps by integrating cybersecurity, backup, and recovery into a single system. Features like centralized management and multi-tenant visibility simplify administration, particularly for MSPs overseeing multiple clients. Scalability is another advantage: Microsoft 365’s native backup options can become costly as organizations grow, whereas third-party providers often use predictable, per-seat pricing. This model helps businesses and MSPs manage expenses while maintaining control over data lifecycle and compliance.

The shift toward third-party solutions reflects broader trends in cloud security, where shared responsibility models place more onus on customers. While Microsoft 365 remains a dominant productivity platform, its limitations in data protection underscore the need for additional layers of security. For organizations handling sensitive data or operating in regulated sectors, the risks of relying solely on native tools may outweigh the convenience.

What to watch

As ransomware attacks on cloud environments increase, demand for integrated backup and cybersecurity solutions is likely to grow. Businesses should monitor how Microsoft evolves its native protection features, particularly in response to third-party innovations. Meanwhile, MSPs and IT teams may need to reassess their backup strategies to ensure they align with compliance requirements and threat landscapes.

Discussion · coming soon

Be the first to join the thread when community discussion launches.